PhotosLocation


Coso_Volcanic_Field Latitude and Longitude:

36°02′N 117°49′W / 36.03°N 117.82°W / 36.03; -117.82
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Coso Volcanic Field
A basaltic lava flow that is typical of the process that created the stepped terraces of Coso as it flowed across the landscape, producing a more or less flat surface eroding to a sheer front.
Highest point
Elevation7,874 ft (2,400 m) [1]
Coordinates 36°02′N 117°49′W / 36.03°N 117.82°W / 36.03; -117.82 [1]
Geography
Location Inyo County, California, US
Parent range Coso Range
Topo map USGS Cactus Pk (CA)
Geology
Age of rock Pliocene to Quaternary [1]
Mountain type Monogenetic volcanic field and Lava domes [1]
Last eruption39,000 yrs

The Coso Volcanic Field is located in Inyo County, California, at the western edge of the Basin and Range geologic province and northern region of the Mojave Desert. The Fossil Falls are part of the Coso Field, created by the prehistoric Owens River. They are within the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake and northeast of Little Lake and U.S. Route 395.

Geology

Initiation of volcanism at Coso preceded the onset of Basin and Range crustal extension there, as expressed by normal faulting. The earlier of the two principal periods of volcanism began with the emplacement of basalt flows over a surface of little relief. Then, during the ensuing period of approximately 1.5 million years, eruptive activity included chemically more evolved rocks erupted upon a faulted terrain of substantial relief. Following a 1.5-million-year hiatus with few eruptions, a bimodal volcanic field of basalt lava flows and rhyolite lava domes and flows developed on Basin and Range terrain of essentially the same form as today's landscape. Many of the young basalt flows are inter-canyon, occupying parts of the present-day drainage system.[ citation needed]

The Coso Volcanic Field is best known for its Pleistocene rhyolite. Thirty-eight rhyolite domes and flows form an elongate array atop a north-trending 8 by 20 kilometres (5.0 mi × 12.4 mi) horst of Mesozoic bedrock. Nearby uneroded constructional forms are exhibited by most domes. Many are nested within tuff ring craters, and a few filled and overrode their craters to feed flows a kilometer or two long. The two oldest domes contain several percent phenocrysts; the rest are essentially aphyric. Obsidian is exposed locally on most extrusions, and analyses of fresh glass indicate that all of the rhyolite is of the so-called high-silica variety; SiO2 content is essentially constant at 77 percent. Other major-element constituents are nearly invariant. However, trace-element contents vary and help define 7 age groups, each of unique chemical composition.[ citation needed]

Prehistoric Period

Obsidian from the Coso Volcanic Fields was heavily exploited by Native American Coso People to make knives, projectile points, and the like (Hughes 1998). The chief period of exploitation was between approximately 3000 and 1000 years ago, when people mined obsidian by constructing benches in hillsides and digging deep pits to access raw materials (Elston and Zeier 1984; Gilreath and Hildebrand 1997). Obsidian from the volcanic fields was traded all the way to the California coast in San Diego, San Luis Obispo County, Santa Barbara, California, and throughout the Mojave Desert and regions further east. Archaeologists recognize at least four different geochemical subsources: Sugarloaf, West Sugarloaf, Joshua Ridge, and West Cactus Peak. These different subsources were used to varying degrees in different time periods, but the Sugarloaf and West Sugarloaf were the most commonly exploited geochemical types (Eerkens and Rosenthal 2004; Ericson and Glascock 2004).

Coso Geothermal Power Project

Coso Geothermal Power Project
The Navy 1 geothermal power plant of the Coso Geothermal Power Project
Official nameCoso Geothermal Power Project
Country United States
Location NAWS China Lake
Inyo County, California
Coordinates 36°02′00″N 117°49′00″W / 36.03333°N 117.81667°W / 36.03333; -117.81667 (Coso Geothermal Power Project - Navy 1)
StatusOperational
Commission dateNavy I: May 1987 [2]
Navy II: 1988
BLM East: 1989
BLM West: 1989
Operator(s)Coso Operating Company
Geothermal power station
Type Flash steam
Wells139
Max. well depth13,000 ft (4,000 m)
Site elevation
  • 7,874 ft (2,400 m)
Power generation
Units operational3 x 30.7 MW
6 x 30 MW [2] [3]
Nameplate capacity272.2 MW [3]
Capacity factor53.7% [2]
Annual net output1,175 GWh (2018) [3]
External links
Website Coso Operating Company
Commons Related media on Commons

The Coso Volcanic Field is well known as a geothermal area. Fumaroles are present along faults bounding the rhyolite-capped horst and locally within the rhyolite field. A multi-disciplinary program of geothermal assessment carried out in the 1970s defined a potential resource of 650 megawatts electric with a nominal life span of 30 years. Judged by the youthfulness of the rhyolite lavas and by a zone of low seismic velocity crust roughly beneath the rhyolite, a magma body may be the source of thermal energy for the geothermal system.

Commercial power development began in the 1980s. Located within the Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake Station near Ridgecrest, California, power plants at the Coso Geothermal were operated by Caithness Energy, LLC (Reno, Nevada) and sold in 2006. It currently produces 270 MW from four geothermal power plants. More than 100 wells have been drilled throughout the field, with production depths from 2,000 to 12,000 feet (610 to 3,700 m), and temperatures from 200 to 350 °C (392 to 662 °F). Coso began generating electricity in 1987. Improvements have resulted in more efficient use of the resource. [4]

Seismicity

The Coso Volcanic Field is one of the most seismically active regions in the United States, producing dozens of tremors in the M1 and M2 range each week. Tremors in the M3 range occur at a rate of 2–6 per month and M4 quakes occur two-three times each year. Recent activity in the M5 range happened in 1996 and 1998 when tremors of M5.3, M5.1, M5.2, and M5.0 occurred within a day of each other. These tremors were actually recorded along the eastern side of the Coso Volcanic Field, 15 miles (24 km). September 30, 2009 to October 6, 2009 there have been 429 earthquakes ranging from 0.1 to 5.2. Some days have activity at about one tremor every minute. On October 2, 2009 there were three earthquakes, (5.2, 4.7, and a 4.9), all within one hour of each other.

On July 4th and 5th, 2019 two large earthquakes sparked a surge of activity in the area in and around the Coso Volcanic Field. The first large quake on July 4 registered M6.4 and the largest on July 5 registered M7.1. Within a week, more than 8000 (M1.0-4.5) smaller earthquakes had joined the swarm, though only 27 quakes larger than M4.5 occurred after the largest events. Surprisingly, there were no fatalities in California. Residents in Ridgecrest and neighboring unincorporated town Trona had moderate to severe property damage. Two structure fires, loss of power for up to 24 hours in some areas, and Trona was without water. Highway 178, one of the two ways in or out of Trona was blocked from rockslides and impassable shifted sections of asphalt. Ridgecrest had declared a state of emergency as a result. [5] One fatality was reported in Nevada in the following days. [6]

Earthquake swarms are common in the Coso area, often producing hundreds of tremors over periods as short as a few days. This brisk and robust seismic activity is common in volcanic areas, such as Long Valley Caldera near Mammoth Lakes, and Yellowstone Caldera at Yellowstone. The Coso Volcanic Field shows examples of volcanic activity, probably last active 30,000 to 40,000 years ago, but ash emission and small cone building episodes may be Holocene (>10,000 years) in age.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Coso Volcanic Field". Global Volcanism Program. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 2009-01-06.
  2. ^ a b c cosogeo. "Project Information". Coso Operating Company. Retrieved 2020-02-04.
  3. ^ a b c "Electricity Data Browser - List of plants for geothermal, California, all sectors, Coso". www.eia.gov. Retrieved 2020-02-04.
  4. ^ "Geothermal California" (PDF). GRC Bulletin. Geothermal Resources Council. September 2002. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2014. Retrieved 18 May 2014.
  5. ^ Lin, Rong-Gong (10 July 2019). "Must Reads: Ridgecrest earthquake mystery: Why so little destruction from huge temblors?". LA Times. Retrieved 10 July 2019.
  6. ^ "How could a Ridgecrest earthquake kill someone 95 miles away in Nevada?". LA Times. 10 July 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2019.

Further reading

  • Eerkens, Jelmer W. and Jeffrey S. Rosenthal. 2004. Are Obsidian Subsources Meaningful Units of Analysis?: Temporal and Spatial Patterning of Subsources in the Coso Volcanic Field, Southeastern California. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:21–29.
  • Elston, Robert G. and Charles D. Zeier. 1984. The Sugarloaf Obsidian Quarry. Report prepared for the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, California, by Intermountain Research. NWC Administrative Publication 313.
  • Ericson, Jonathon E. and Michael D. Glascock. 2004. Subsource Characterization: Obsidian Utilization of Subsources of the Coso Volcanic Field, Coso Junction, California, USA. Geoarchaeology 19:779–805.
  • Garfinkel, Alan P. 2006. Paradigm Shifts, Rock Art Studies, and the "Coso Sheep Cult" of Eastern California. North American Archaeologist 27(3):203–244
  • Garfinkel, Alan P. 2007. Archaeology and Rock Art of the Eastern Sierra and Great Basin Frontier. Maturango Museum Publication Number 22. Maturango Press, Ridgecrest, California.
  • Garfinkel, Alan P., Donald R. Austin, David Earle, and Harold Williams. 2009. Myth, Ritual and Rock Art: Coso Decorated Animal-Humans and the Animal Master. Rock Art Research 26(2):179–197. The Journal of the Australian Rock Art Research Association (AURA) and of the International Federation of Rock Art Organizations (IFRAO).
  • Garfinkel, Alan P., David A. Young, and Robert M. Yohe, II. 2010. Bighorn Hunting, Resource Depression, and Rock Art in the Coso Range of Eastern California: A Computer Simulation Model. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:42–51.
  • Gilreath, Amy J. and William R. Hildebrandt. 1997. Prehistoric Use of the Coso Volcanic Field. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 56, Berkeley, California.
  • Hughes, Richard E. 1988. The Coso Volcanic Field Reexamined: Implications for Obsidian Sourcing and Hydration Dating Research. Geoarchaeology 3:253–265.

External links