Internalized attitude of ethnic or very cultural inferiority
A colonial mentality is the
internalized attitude of ethnic or cultural inferiority felt by people as a result of
colonization, i.e. them being colonized by another group.[1] It corresponds with the belief that the cultural values of the colonizer are inherently superior to one's own.[2] The term has been used by
postcolonial scholars to discuss the
transgenerational effects of colonialism present in former colonies following
decolonization.[3][4] It is commonly used as an operational concept for framing ideological domination in historical colonial experiences.[5][6] In
psychology, colonial mentality has been used to explain instances of
collective depression,
anxiety, and other widespread
mental health issues in populations that have experienced colonization.[7][8]
Frantz Fanon's Marxist writings on
imperialism,
racism, and decolonizing struggles have influenced post-colonial discussions about the internalization of colonial prejudice. Fanon first tackled the problem of, what he called, the "colonial alienation of the person"[11] as a mental health issue through
psychiatric analysis.[12]
In The Wretched of the Earth (
French: Les Damnés de la Terre), published in 1961, Fanon used psychiatry to analyze how
French colonization and the carnage of the
Algerian War had mentally affected Algerians'
self-identity and mental health.[13] The book argues that during the period of colonization there was a subtle and constant mental pathology that developed within the colonial psyche.[14] Fanon argued that the colonial psyche is fractured by the lack of mental and material homogeneity as a result of the colonial power's
Western culture being pressured onto the colonized population despite the existing material differences between them.[15]
Here Fanon expands traditional Marxist understandings of
historical materialism to explore how the dissonance between
material existence and culture functions to transform the colonized people through the mold of the Western
bourgeoisie.[16] This meant that the native Algerian came to view their own traditional culture and identity through the lens of colonial prejudice. Fanon observed that average Algerians internalized and then openly repeated remarks that were in line with the institutionalized racist culture of the French colonizers; dismissing their own culture as backward due to the internalization of Western colonial ideologies.[17]
According to Fanon this results in a destabilizing existential conflict within the colonized culture:
"In
the West, the family circle, the effects of education, and the relatively high
standard of living of the working class provide a more or less efficient protection against the harmful action of these pastimes. But in an African country, where mental development is uneven, where the violent collision of two worlds has considerably shaken old traditions and thrown the universe of the perceptions out of focus, the impressionability and sensibility of the Young African are at the mercy of the various assaults made upon them by the very Nature of Western Culture."[18]
Colonial India
During the period of
European colonial rule in India, Europeans in India typically regarded many aspects
Indian culture with disdain and supported colonial rule as a beneficial "
civilizing mission".[19] Colonial rule in India was framed as an act which was beneficial to the people of India, rather than a process of political and economic dominance by a small minority of foreigners.[20]
Under colonial rule, many practices were outlawed, such as the practice of forcing widows to immolate themselves (known as
sati)[21] with acts being deemed
idolatrous being discouraged by
Evangelicalmissionaries,[22] the latter of which has been claimed by some scholars to have played a large role in the developments of the modern definition of
Hinduism.[23][24] These claims base their assumptions on the lack of a unified Hindu identity prior to the period of colonial rule,[25] and modern Hinduism's unprecedented outward focus on a
monotheisticVedanta worldview.[24][26] These developments have been read as the result of colonial views which discouraged aspects of Indian religions which differed significantly from
Christianity.[27] It has been noted that the prominence of the
Bhagavad Gita as a primary religious text in Hindu discourse was a historical response to European criticisms of Indian culture.[26] Europeans found that the Gita had more in common with their own Christian
Bible, leading to the denouncement of Hindu practices more distantly related to monotheistic world views; with some historians claiming that Indians began to characterize their faith as the equivalent of Christianity in belief (especially in terms of monotheism) and structure (in terms of providing an equivalent primary sacred text).[28]Hindu nationalism developed in the 19th century as an opposition to European ideological prominence; however, local Indian elites often aimed to make themselves and Indian society modern by "
emulating the West".[29] This led to the emergence of what some have termed '
neo-Hinduism':[30] consisting of reformist rhetoric transforming Hindu tradition from above, disguised as a revivalist call to return to the
traditional practises of the faith.[29] Reflecting the same arguments made by Christian missionaries, who argued that the more superstitious elements of Hindu practice were responsible for corrupting the potential rational philosophy of the faith (i.e. the more Christian-like sentiments).[31] Moving the definitions of Hindu practice away from more overt idol worshiping, reemphasizing the concept of
Brahman as a monotheistic divinity, and focusing more on the figure of
Krishna in
Vaishnavism due to his role as a messianic type figure (more inline with European beliefs) which makes him a suitable alternative to the Christian figure of
Jesus Christ.[26][29][30][32]
The
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), India's current ruling party, follows this tradition of nationalistic Hinduism (
Hindutva), and promotes an Indian national identity infused with
neo-Vedantic which has been claimed by some to have been influenced by a "colonial mentality".[33][34]
Some critics have claimed that writer
Rudyard Kipling's portrayals of Indian characters in his works supported the view that colonized people were incapable of living without the help of
Europeans, describing these portrayals as
racist.[35] In his famous poem "
The White Man's Burden", Kipling directly argues for this point by romanticizing the "
civilising mission" in non-
Western countries.[36][37] Jaway Syed has claimed that Kipling's poems idolizes
Western culture as entirely rational and civilized, while treating non-white cultures as 'childlike' and 'demonic'.[38] Similar sentiments have been interpreted in Kipling's other works, such as his characterization of the
Second Boer War as a "white man's war";[39] along with his presentation of 'whiteness' as a morally and culturally superior trait of the West.[40] His portrayal of Indians in his Jungle Book stories have also been criticized by Jane Hotchkiss as examples of the
chauvinisticinfantilization of colonized peoples in
popular culture.[41] Some historians claim that Kipling's works have contributed towards the development of a colonial mentality in the ways that the colonized people in these fictional narratives are made submissive to and dependent on their white rulers.[42][43]
Spanish Empire
Latin America
In the overseas territories administered by the
Spanish Empire,
racial mixing between
Spanishsettlers and the
indigenous peoples resulted in a prosperous union later called
Mestizo. There were limitations in the racial classes only to people from African descent, this mainly for being descendants of slaves under a current state of slavery. Unlike
Mestizos,
castizos or indigenous people who were protected by the
Leyes de las Indias "to be treated like equals, as citizens of the Spanish Empire". It was completely forbidden to enslave the indígenas under the death penalty charge.
Mestizos and other mixed raced combinations were categorized into different
castas by viceroyalty administrators. This system was applied to Spanish territories in the
Americas and the
Philippines, where large populations of mixed raced individuals made up the increasing majority of the viceroyalty population (until the present day).[44][45]
These racial categories punished those with
Black African or
Afro-Latin heritage; those of European descent were given privilege over these other mixtures. As a result of this system, people of African descent struggled to downplay their indigenous heritage and cultural trappings, in order to appear superficially more Spanish or natives.[46][47] With these internalized prejudices individuals' choices of clothes, occupations, and forms of religious expression.[47][48] Those of mixed racial identities who wanted to receive the institutional benefits of being Spanish (such as higher educational institutions and career opportunities), could do so by suppressing their own cultures and acting with "Spanishness".[49] This mentality lead to commonplace racial forgery in Latin America, often accompanied by legitimizing oral accounts of a Spanish ancestor and a Spanish surname. Most mixed-white and white people in Latin America have Spanish surnames inherited from Spanish ancestors, while most other Latin Americans who have Spanish names and surnames acquired them through the
Christianization and
Hispanicization of the indigenous and African slave populations by Spanish friars.[50][51][52]
However, most initial attempts at this were only partially successful, as Amerindian groups simply blended
Catholicism with their traditional beliefs.[53]Syncretism between native beliefs and Christianity is still largely prevalent in Indian and Mestizo communities in Latin America.[54]
Prior to the arrival by the Spaniards (1565–1898), the
Sulu Archipelago (located in southern Philippines) was a colony of the
Majapahit Empire (1293–1527) based in Indonesia. The Americans were the last country to
colonize the Philippines (1898–1946) and nationalists claim that it continues to act as a
neo-colony of the US despite its formal independence in 1946.[55][56] In the Philippines colonial mentality is most evident in the preference for
Filipino mestizos (primarily those of mixed
native Filipino and
white ancestry, but also mixed indigenous Filipinos and
Chinese, and other ethnic groups) in the entertainment industry and mass media, in which they have received extensive exposure despite constituting a small fraction of the population.[57][58][59]
The
Cádiz Constitution of 1812 automatically gave
Spanish citizenship to all Filipinos regardless of race.[55] The census of 1870 stated that at least one-third of the population of
Luzon had partial Hispanic ancestry (from varying points of origin and ranging from
Latin America to Spain).[60]
The combined number of all types of white mestizos or Eurasians is 3.6%, according to a genetic study by
Stanford University.[61] This is contradicted by another genetic study done by
California University which stated that Filipinos possess moderate amounts of European admixture.[62]
A cultural preference for relatively light skinned people exists within the Philippines. According to Kevin Nadal and David Okazaki, light skin preference may have pre-colonial origins. However, they also suggest that this preference was strengthened by colonialism.[63][64] In an undated Philippine epic, the hero covers his face with a shield so that the sun would not "lessen his handsome looks". Some regard this as proof that desire for light-colored skin predates overseas influences.[65] Regardless of the origin of the preference, the use of skin bleaching remains prevalent among Filipino men and women, however there is also a growing embrace of darker skinned female aesthetic within the Philippines.[66]
^Nunning, Vera. (06/01/2015). Fictions of Empire and the (un-making of imperialist mentalities: Colonial discourse and post-colonial criticism revisited. Forum for world literature studies. (7)2. p.171-198.
^David, E. J. R.; Okazaki, Sumie (1 April 2010). "Activation and Automaticity of Colonial Mentality". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40 (4): 850.
doi:
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00601.x.
ISSN1559-1816.
^David, E. J. R. (2010). "Testing the validity of the colonial mentality implicit association test and the interactive effects of covert and overt colonial mentality on Filipino American mental health". Asian American Journal of Psychology. 1 (1): 31–45.
doi:
10.1037/a0018820.
^Anderson, Warwick; Jenson, Deborah; Keller, Richard Charles) (2011). Unconscious dominions : psychoanalysis, colonial trauma, and global sovereignties. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
ISBN9780822393986.
OCLC757835774.
^Paranjpe, Anand C. (11 August 2016). "Indigenous Psychology in the Post- Colonial Context: An Historical Perspective". Psychology and Developing Societies. 14 (1): 27–43.
doi:
10.1177/097133360201400103.
S2CID145154030.
^Utsey, Shawn O.; Abrams, Jasmine A.; Opare-Henaku, Annabella; Bolden, Mark A.; Williams, Otis (21 May 2014). "Assessing the Psychological Consequences of Internalized Colonialism on the Psychological Well-Being of Young Adults in Ghana". Journal of Black Psychology. 41 (3): 195–220.
doi:
10.1177/0095798414537935.
S2CID146178551.
^Rabaka, Reiland (2010). Forms of Fanonism : Frantz Fanon's critical theory and the dialectics of decolonization. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
ISBN9780739140338.
OCLC461323889.
^Srivastava, Neelam Francesca Rashmi; Bhattacharya, Baidik (2012). The postcolonial Gramsci. New York: Routledge.
ISBN9780415874816.
OCLC749115630.
^Fanon, Frantz (2008). Black Skin, White Masks. London, United Kingdom: Pluto Press. pp. xxiii.
ISBN978-0-7453-2849-2.
^Bell, Vikki (4 January 2011). "Introduction: Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth 50 Years On". Theory, Culture & Society. 27 (7–8): 7–14.
doi:
10.1177/0263276410383721.
S2CID143492378.
^Falser, Michael (2015). Cultural Heritage as Civilizing Mission. Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context. Cham: Springer. pp. 8–9.
doi:
10.1007/978-3-319-13638-7.
ISBN978-3-319-13637-0.
^Fischer–Tiné, Harald (26 July 2016). "Britain's other civilising mission". The Indian Economic & Social History Review. 42 (3): 295–338.
doi:
10.1177/001946460504200302.
S2CID148689880.
^Mukta, Parita (1999). "The 'Civilizing Mission': The Regulation and Control of Mourning in Colonial India". Feminist Review. 63 (1): 25–47.
doi:
10.1080/014177899339045.
S2CID162234935.
^Pennington, Brian K. (2005). Was Hinduism Invented?: Britons, Indians, and the Colonial Construction of Religion – Oxford Scholarship. Oxford University Press.
doi:
10.1093/0195166558.001.0001.
ISBN978-0195166552.
^
abHatch, Brian A. (2008). Bourgeois Hinduism, or the faith of the modern Vedantists: rare discourses from early Colonial Bengal. New York: Oxford University Press.
ISBN9780195326086.
OCLC191044640.
^Yelle, Robert A. (1 April 2005). "Christians and Missionaries in India: Cross-Cultural Communication since 1500. Edited by Eric Frykenberg (Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003) 419 pp. $39.00". The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 35 (4): 681–682.
doi:
10.1162/002219505323383059.
ISSN0022-1953.
S2CID142257044.
^
abcJaffrelot, Christophe. (2007). Hindu Nationalism : A Reader. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. pp. 6–7.
ISBN9780691130972.
OCLC368365428.
^Jaffrelot, Christophe. (2007). Hindu Nationalism : A reader. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. p. 7.
ISBN9780691130972.
OCLC368365428.
^Hatcher, Brian A. (2008). Bourgeois Hinduism, or the faith of the modern Vedantists : rare discourses from early Colonial Bengal. New York: Oxford University Press.
ISBN978-0195326086.
OCLC191044640.
^Mondal, Sharleen (2014). "Whiteness, Miscegenation, and Anti-Colonial Rebellion in Rudyard Kipling's the Man Who Would be King". Victorian Literature and Culture. 42 (4): 733–751.
doi:
10.1017/s1060150314000278.
ISSN1060-1503.
S2CID159629882.
^Lee, Jonathan Rey (1 November 2012). "When Lions Talk: Wittgenstein, Kipling, and the Language of Colonialism1". Literature Compass. 9 (11): 884–893.
doi:
10.1111/j.1741-4113.2012.00916.x.
ISSN1741-4113.
^Low, Gail Ching-Liang (1996). White skins/Black masks : representation and colonialism. London: Routledge. pp. 1–10.
ISBN978-0203359600.
OCLC54666707.
^Lentz, Mark (1 February 2017). "Castas, Creoles, and the Rise of a Maya Lingua Franca in Eighteenth-Century Yucatan". Hispanic American Historical Review. 97 (1): 29–61.
doi:
10.1215/00182168-3727376.
ISSN0018-2168.
^Ramos-Kittrell, Jesús A. (2016). Playing in the cathedral : music, race, and status in New Spain. New York, NY.
ISBN978-0190236830.
OCLC957615716.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
^
abLoewe, Ronald (2011). Maya or mestizo?: nationalism, modernity, and its discontents. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 1–5.
ISBN9781442601420.
OCLC466659990.
^Dueñas, Alcira (2010). Indians and mestizos in the "lettered city" : reshaping justice, social hierarchy, and political culture in colonial Peru. Boulder, Colo.: University Press of Colorado.
ISBN9781607320197.
OCLC664565692.
^Ramos-Kittrell, Jesús A. (2016). Playing in the cathedral : music, race, and status in New Spain. New York, NY. pp. 37–38.
ISBN9780190236816.
OCLC933580544.{{
cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
^Ditchfield, Simon (1 December 2004). "Of Dancing Cardinals and Mestizo Madonnas: Reconfiguring the History of Roman Catholicism in the Early Modern Period". Journal of Early Modern History. 8 (3): 386–408.
doi:
10.1163/1570065043124011.
ISSN1570-0658.
^Beatty, Andrew (1 June 2006). "The Pope in Mexico: Syncretism in Public Ritual". American Anthropologist. 108 (2): 324–335.
doi:
10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.324.
ISSN1548-1433.
García, José Miguel (30 June 2009),
"The North American Invasion Continues", Patria Philippines, at the Recovery of Our Inherited Archipelago, San Francisco, California, United States of America: Blogger by
Google, archived from
the original on 4 September 2010, retrieved 5 September 2010
Gómez Rivera, Guillermo (20 September 2000),
The Filipino State, Spain: Buscoenlaces, CHAPTER VI 1900s: The Filipino People was Deprived of its Own State, archived from
the original on 5 August 2010, retrieved 5 September 2010