The Castro Sweep is a police riot that occurred in the Castro District of San Francisco on the evening of October 6, 1989. The riot, by about 200 members of the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), followed a protest held by ACT UP, a militant direct action group responding to the concerns of people with AIDS.

Earlier that day, members of ACT UP had marched from the Federal Building to the Castro District to protest the United States government's actions during the ongoing AIDS pandemic. During the march, police officers made several arrests. After the march ended at the intersection of Castro and Market Street, more protestors and onlookers met and staged sit-ins and die-ins. At around 8 p.m., the police declared the gathering an unlawful assembly and began to clear the streets. By 10 p.m., the police had withdrawn from the area and protestors later dispersed. Fifty-three people were arrested, while 14, including four officers, were injured.

In the aftermath of the sweep, LGBT news media coverage compared the event to the 1969 Stonewall riots, another notable instance of violent confrontation between police and members of the LGBT community. San Francisco Police Chief Frank Jordan responded to the sweep by suspending, demoting, or reassigning officers who had been involved, while San Francisco Mayor Art Agnos called the event "unacceptable" and urged victims to file complaints with the SFPD's Office of Citizens Complaints. In later lawsuits, the city paid out about $200,000 to victims in settlements.

Background

The California city of San Francisco has historically been a center of LGBT culture in the United States and has a large LGBT community. ^[1] Notable gay villages in the city have included the area along Polk Street, Tenderloin, and the Castro District. ^{[1] [2]} The city also has a history of violent confrontations between members of the LGBT community and the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD), with notable examples including the Compton's Cafeteria riot in 1966 and the White Night riots in 1979. ^{[3] [4]} During the 1980s, the city's LGBT community was severely affected by the AIDS pandemic, ^[5] which disproportionately affected men who have sex with men. ^[6] During this decade, in view of what many LGBT activists saw as a lack of response from the federal government of the United States and other public bodies, several support and advocacy groups for people with AIDS were established, including the Gay Men's Health Crisis and the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power ( ACT UP). ^[6] Throughout the late 1980s, ACT UP led several large-scale protests and demonstrations to both draw attention to the AIDS crisis and to pressure governments to contribute more towards combatting the disease. ^[6]

ACT UP protest

March through San Francisco

On Friday, October 6, 1989, ACT UP activists in San Francisco organized a march through the city to protest government inaction with regards to the AIDS pandemic. ^{[7] [8]} It was part of a nationwide day of protest conducted by ACT UP, ^{[9] [10] [11]} and one of several protest activities conducted by the organization that year. ^[12] In San Francisco, the march was planned to start at the Federal Building in the city's Civic Center and travel to Harvey Milk Plaza at the intersection of Castro and Market Street in the Castro District. ^{[8] [11]} Along the way, the protestors would make stops at the City Hall and the San Francisco Mint. ^{[8] [11]} Over one hundred people were present at the beginning of the march, ^{[note 1]} which commenced around 5 p.m. ^[13]

In previous ACT UP demonstrations, the SFPD would typically assign a small number of officers to aid in traffic control and ensure the protestor's safety, but during the October 6 march, the police presence was much greater than it had been at prior events. ^[8] Shortly after leaving the plaza of the Federal Building and beginning the march to the Castro District, many officers on foot and several on police motorcycles began to follow along with the marchers. ^[8] Additionally, the police brought several police vans with them. ^[11] According to a march participant, while in previous marches the police would close off a single lane to traffic, ^[11] the police this time ordered the marchers to keep only to the sidewalk. ^[8] The police made their first arrest of the day about one block from the Federal Building when Bill Haskell, the tactical coordinator and police liaison for the ACT UP protestors, walked into the street to talk to the officers. ^{[8] [11] [14]} He was thrown to the ground and handcuffed before being taken into a police van and charged with resisting arrest and blocking the street. ^{[8] [11] [14]} According to historian Emily K. Hobson, the arrest of one of the march's coordinators was a police tactic that "weakened [the] marchers' ability to communicate with one another and to respond to officers' presence". ^[9] Police continued to strictly enforce the sidewalk rules for the duration of the march, which lasted for 30 city blocks, with many marchers chanting, " First Amendment under attack! What do we do? ACT UP! Fight back!" ^[14] About halfway through the march, organizers stopped for a brief address to the protestors, reminding them of the AIDS-related goal of the protest and to continue in spite of the police's actions. ^[14]

Gathering at Castro and Market Streets

The march ended around 7 p.m. as the protestors approached the intersection of Castro and Market streets. ^[14] During other ACT UP marches, it had been customary for a brief gathering to be held at the intersection, with organizers giving brief speeches and protestors chanting while some police officers would direct traffic on foot. ^[14] However, when the march finally reached the intersection, there were several hundred police officers present. ^[8] According to Gerard Koskovich, a journalist present during the march, "When I got there I saw the single largest mass of San Francisco police officers I had ever seen at that point. The entire intersection of Castro and Market streets was filled with officers standing in rank". ^[8] The police blocked the protestors from assembling at the intersection and redirected them along Castro Street, ^[14] where about fifty protestors joined hands in a sit-in. ^{[14] [12]} Additionally, twenty protestors staged a die-in on the street. ^{[14] [12]} Despite the police presence, Koskovich and many other protestors did not think that there would be a serious confrontation with the police, as there had not been a violent largescale confrontation between police and LGBT individuals in the Castro District since the White Night riots about a decade ago. ^[10]

As the protesting continued, more onlookers and other participants arrived, ^[8] with the number of people present swelling to around 500 ^{[14] [15]} or 600. ^[16] By this time, the focus of the protesting activity had shifted to the intersection of Castro and 17th Street, where several protestors locked arms and waited to be arrested. ^[16] Additionally, many protestors had begun spray-painting parts of the road with body outlines as an homage to the NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt, ^[9] which, at the time, was headquartered about two blocks away. ^[14] They also added slogans, such as "Profits=Death" and "Black People Die Faster". ^[16] During this time, some protestors also began chanting, "SFPD racist, sexist, anti-gay. SFPD go away". ^[8] According to Koskovich, the point where things turned violent began when someone knocked over a parked police motorcycle. ^{[8] [16]} Following this, an officer clubbed a protestor on their shoulder, ^[8] and shortly thereafter other officers joined in and began to club protestors. ^[16]

Police riot

At around 8 p.m., the police announced that the gathering was an unlawful assembly and began to march shoulder-to-shoulder down Castro Street towards 18th Street. ^[8] Many of the officers wore riot gear, ^[9] and several people on the streets were attacked by officers wielding nightsticks. ^{[9] [17]} Officers ordered individuals to remain inside nearby buildings and announced that anyone on the streets or sidewalks faced arrest. ^[8] The Reverend Jim Schexnayder, the director of HIV/AIDS services for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland, was on Castro Street at the time and was ordered into a nearby building by a SFPD officer. ^[8] About 200 officers, representing approximately half of all SFPD officers on duty at the time, ^[7] participated in the sweep, which covered about 7 city blocks. ^[18] During the sweep, protestors began to chant the helmet badge number of a police officer who had assaulted a nineteen-year-old at the rally, rendering him unconscious and in need of several stitches. ^[19] According to Koskovich, the police regrouped around 9 p.m. and continued their sweep. ^{[20] [21]} By about 10 p.m., police had left the area, ^{[8] [9]} with many of the protestors remaining on the streets. ^[20] Following this, some ACT UP members gathered at the intersection of Castro and 18th and, after some cheering, left the area as well. ^{[8] [20]}

Aftermath

The incident was the first police riot in the Castro District since the White Night riots of 1979. ^[10] In total, SFPD officers arrested 53 individuals, while 14 people, including 4 police officers, were injured. ^{[8] [22] [17]} Several of the protestors who were arrested were charged with assault. ^[19] The following night, about 1,500 people took the streets of the Castro District as a show of resistance against the police actions the previous night. ^[8] The same day, San Francisco Mayor Art Agnos released a statement to the Bay Area Reporter, a local LGBT newspaper, saying that the police's actions on October 6 were "unacceptable". ^[8] He also urged individuals who were harassed or in some way victims of the police's actions to file formal complaints with the SFPD's Office of Citizens Complaints. ^[14] On Sunday, October 8, the spray-painted slogans and body outlines were painted over by the police. ^[16] The event was widely covered by the LGBT news media. The following week, the headline for the Bay Area Reporter read, "Castro Held Hostage". ^[8] The New York City-based LGBT news magazine OutWeek reported on the event in several issues published later that month. In their coverage, they compare the event to the 1969 Stonewall riots, a watershed moment in LGBT history that saw patrons of a gay bar in New York City fight back against police officers during a police raid. ^{[11] [23]}

Police and city response

Five days after the sweep, ACT UP issued a response in which they called for the resignation of the San Francisco Chief of Police Frank Jordan, a plan for public accountability, and disciplinary actions against officers who had been involved. ^[19] The SFPD responded to the sweep by either suspending, demoting, or reassigning some of the officers who had been involved. ^[24] Chief Jordan reprimanded Deputy Chief Frank Reed, who was head of the SFPD's Patrol Bureau, and Captain Richard Fife was moved to the Traffic Bureau. ^[8] Jordan was also going to demote Deputy Chief Jack Jordan, his brother, but Jack resigned before he could do so. ^[8] Captain Richard Cairns, who had been the tactical squad leader on the night of the sweep, was placed on administrative duty and later suspended from the SFPD for beating several protestors with his nightstick. ^[8] Cairns objected to the suspension and later sued the city for its handling of his disciplinary case, arguing that he had acted in self-defense. ^[8] The SFPD also made changes to its guidelines regarding their liaisons to the LGBT community after the event. ^[24] According to the GLBT Historical Society, the disciplinary hearings "revealed the weakness of the city’s civilian police oversight system", ^[7] and they said that protests from the LGBT community regarding police accountability for the sweep would continue for the next three years. ^[7] Several protestors received payments from the city due to damages sustained in the sweep, ^[24] as a group of citizens who had been present at the sweep later sued the city and settled out of court, with the city paying out about $200,000. ^{[8] [22] [7] [note 2]}

Later history

Since the event, the GLBT Historical Society has held several panel discussions about the sweep and its aftermath, including one on the 20th anniversary of the sweep in 2009 ^[8] and another on the 30th anniversary in 2019. ^{[7] [25]} A vigil was held at the site of the sweep on the 25th anniversary in 2014. ^[22] Speaking about the impact of the sweep in 2019, assistant editor John Ferrannini of the Bay Area Reporter wrote that "The Castro Sweep deepened divisions between the LGBT community and the police, which had already been frayed by decades of harassment in bars, the assassination of gay Supervisor Harvey Milk by former police officer and disgruntled ex-supervisor Dan White in 1978, and the subsequent White Night riots the following year". ^[26] In 2014, when asked by the Bay Area Reporter if another incident such as the sweep could occur, San Francisco Police Chief Greg Suhr stated, "I would say very, very plainly 'Not on my watch.' That's a phrase we use in the police department when we say we're committed to something just absolutely not happening. ... We're a different police department". ^[22]

Several historians have theorized about the rationale for the police action on the night of the sweep. According to Hobson, the sweep may have been in retaliation for a September 1989 event held by another AIDS-advocacy group at the San Francisco Opera. ^[19] Additionally, it may have been caused by ACT UP's opposition to Mayor Agnos's plans for a new baseball stadium in the city. ^[19] In a 2002 article, Koskovich stated that, six months prior to the sweep, ACT UP members had chased police officers out of the Castro District during the funeral of AIDS activist Terry Sutton, which may have led to a police reprisal on October 6. ^{[27] [12]}

Explanatory notes

Citations

General and cited sources

Further reading

• Gerber, Lynne (2018). "We Who Must Die Demand a Miracle: Christmas 1989 at the Metropolitan Community Church of San Francisco". In Frank, Gillian; Moreton, Bethany; White, Heather R. (eds.). Devotions and Desires: Histories of Sexuality and Religion in the Twentieth-Century United States. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 253–276. ISBN  978-1-4696-3627-6.
• Laird, Cynthia (March 9, 2022). "Dennis Cunningham, an attorney who represented gays in 'Castro Sweep' lawsuit, dies". Bay Area Reporter. Archived from the original on March 29, 2022. Retrieved June 6, 2022.

External links

Videos of the Castro Sweep
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy2uLw2sNME
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyV3tZE_xDg